Search for: "People v Manners" Results 1041 - 1060 of 7,009
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2021, 6:24 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Pregnant people were consequently excluded from the first vaccine clinical trials and too few people in the trial got pregnant during trials to include them in a statistically robust manner. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The post GWU Law Student Gov't Directs People to Stop Saying/Writing "Illegal," "Alien," and "Assimilation" re: Immigration appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
9 May 2016, 2:16 pm by Giles Peaker
The court decided that on the face of it, the circumstances were different to both The Mayor Commonality and Citizens of London v Samedi [2012] EWCA Civ 160 (Parliament Square) and Mayor of London v Hall and others [2011] 1 WLR 504 (St Pauls/Occupy). [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:19 pm
From yesterday’s Appellate Court of Illinois decision in People v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
The stuff you see on TV pales in comparison to what's actually happening in people's homes and our courthouses.In People v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:51 am by Kent Scheidegger
CJLF has filed this friend-of-the-court brief in Maples v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 10:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Note also that publicly urging people to fire someone for his speech, even when the firing would be illegal, is likely constitutionally protected under Brandenburg v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 4:29 am by Bystander
When it came to the fine we were handed the report of HHJ McDowall's sentencing remarks in the case of Environment Agency v Pizza Express in the Crown Court, which pretty much did the job for us, being admirably clear and well-reasoned. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 9:08 am by Jeff Vail
Wiggins, 279 P.3d 1 (Colo. 2012) (quoting C.R.C.P. 45 as permitting subpoenas to request ESI); People v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
That is, Section 7 might make censors think twice before removing speech from the Platforms in a viewpoint-discriminatory manner” It’s such a clever phrase that maybe the judge should get a trademark for it. [read post]
14 May 2007, 11:29 am
By settling this case we preserve our rights to serve our people in the manner we feel is best. [read post]
5 May 2008, 11:23 am
True, these facts were presented in an erroneous fashion -- in a manner called the "prosecutor's fallacy" -- that wrongly conflates guilt and match probabilities. [read post]