Search for: "People v. Black"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 5,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2012, 10:00 am
By Eric Goldman Premier Pool Management Corp. v. [read post]
22 May 2020, 8:51 am
In 2016, the Movement for Black Lives called for reparations and published a list of solutions ranging from open access to public universities to a universal basic income. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 9:01 am
Because whether it's three miles per hour or fifty really does matter to people like me. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 6:12 am
” According to the court, the Plaintiff “perceived that the word “spooks” was used as a derogatory term for Black people, and recalled that her co-workers all turned to look at her when the remark was made. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
in Illinois v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:21 am
Black's Dictionary further defines `private’ as “confidential; secret. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:46 am
A number of other people were at the apartment, including [Black], who had gone to the apartment with John Owens. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:23 am
It is the first Supreme Court case to do so directly since the court upheld the right of students to wear black arm bands to school to protest the war in Vietnam, declaring in Tinker v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 3:31 am
Women, blacks, Asians, people in wheelchairs, all bring different perspectives to the table. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
Could a state exclude free Blacks? [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 11:43 am
(Indian Child Welfare Act, termination of parental rights) The People v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 11:43 am
Supreme Court barred the execution of people with intellectual disability in Atkins v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:36 am
In People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 2:15 pm
At Wednesday's oral argument in Abuelhawa v. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 1:19 am
[Rooney v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:37 pm
US v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 11:52 am
" To further that agenda, the Convention placed nine crimes in §241 of the State's Constitution as bases for disenfranchisement, believing that more Black people would be convicted of those crimes than White people. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 3:55 pm
The Supreme Court again reversed the defendants’ convictions in Norris v Alabama. [read post]
