Search for: "People v. Deems" Results 1041 - 1060 of 4,565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2018, 1:15 pm
Supreme Court addressed and correctly deemed unconstitutional in Foster v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:49 am by INFORRM
  When the sentence was passed it was of such a length that it would never have been deemed “spent” for the purposes of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act (‘ROA’). [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:30 am by Atty. Gregory A. Holbus
  Applicants who are deemed a high risk for defaulting on their loan are either denied or approved for the loan, but with conditions that reduce the lender's risk. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:47 am
This ruling buried the notion that a design could be deemed unoriginal by 'mosaicing' a corpus of different earlier designs. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
NEW YORK COUNTYBusiness LawTrial Will Resolve Whether Ordered Furniture Is Deemed Custom Made in Substantial Part Julio v. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 1:17 am
KINGS COUNTYCriminal Practice Defendant Ruled Not in Custody During Initial Pre-'Miranda' Statements; Suppression Denied People v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 1:34 am
NASSAU COUNTYCivil PracticeService on Respondent's Officer Deemed Personal Service on Company Under RPAPL §735, CPLR §311 McDee Family LP v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Mosvick
” The Court had deemed review of state apportionment schemes a “political question” not justiciable by federal courts (a doctrine which had its origins in the 1848 decision Luther v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 12:23 pm by John Floyd
  On August 2, 2017, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a significant ruling, United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 12:23 pm by John Floyd
  On August 2, 2017, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a significant ruling, United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by Josh Blackman
The government has sought to resolve this tension in this fashion: People who are subject to an entry ban should not be issued a visa, for such an act would be futile. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm by NL
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Wade (1973) (as later limited by Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
  What these people had demonstrated during this period of time was that they did not recognize the sovereignty of the People’s Republic of China over HKSAR, and they did not support the policy of the “One Country, Two systems”. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm by INFORRM
Riley v Murray, then, sits uncomfortably with the Court of Appeal’s decision in Miller v College of Policing [2021] EWCA Civ 1926,  which was handed down on the same day. [read post]