Search for: "People v. Finely" Results 1041 - 1060 of 5,637
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2009, 11:58 am
But when you put everything together, this whole scheme nonetheless just seems fine. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:48 am by M@jux-@dmin
Seq., people who are charged with indictable offenses (crimes of the first, second, third, or fourth degree) may be eligible for pretrial intervention (PTI). [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 10:29 am by Ashby Jones
In his ruling, according to the AP, Fine said that it is safe to assume innocent people have been executed. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm
  There's a fine line between an intellectual critique and a personal slam. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For Madison, the Constitution rested neither on sovereign states nor one national people but instead was founded on the people of the states (importantly in the plural) “in their highest sovereign capacity,” occupying what he later described as a “middle ground” between Hayne’s and Webster’s positions.[2] While some scholars have depicted the debate over the nature of the Union in binary terms, careful studies have long identified and appreciated… [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
But I have a rare situation in which the client — me — is just fine with publicizing a rough draft; and I just want to make the brief as clear and as substantively correct as possible. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 5:17 pm
He said more or less the same thing in his majority opinion in Kelo v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket, Roger Fairfax looks at Nelson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 4:08 pm
You can't teach, force or even bribe people to do it. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:36 am
   So California says, fine, we won't give them reduced tuition on that basis. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
  I suppose the only people that can answer that for most of those questions would be a jury of our peers. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
In 2007 the Istanbul Assize Court convicted Gürbüz and Bayar of the offence of publishing statements by a terrorist organisation, under the Prevention of Terrorism Act (Law no. 3713) and both were ordered to pay a fine. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 4:16 am by Woodrow Pollack
The potential fine there was in the trillions of dollars. [read post]