Search for: "People v. Long"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 19,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2017, 10:44 am
Board of Education of Ewing, Lyng v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am
Introduction On 13 May 2020, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R v Adams (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 19. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 7:12 am
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled yesterday, in Warshak v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 11:00 am
It got a lot of attention, as did Peter’s first shot at a Supreme Court opinion in HTML form, Two Pesos v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:54 am
Talk about the "long reach of the law," eh? [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:41 pm
Which -- notwithstanding the clear dictates of the rule -- permits oral waivers as long as there's a detailed colloquy with the trial court in which the defendant is told that (1) the jury's twelve people, (2) the defendant gets to help select the jury, (3) the verdict must be unanimous, and (4) at a bench trial, only the judge decides guilt. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:49 pm
When the government invents -- out of whole cloth -- a purported "stash house" that purportedly has a ton of cocaine in it, and then seeks out (in a "reverse sting") people to steal from it, there's a huge ability to set defendants up for long sentences based upon a purported volume of drugs that never actually existed.I would nonetheless side with Judge Fisher's majority opinion. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm
The FBI has a long reach.And are pretty darn sophisticated. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm
On 12/15/09 in People v Wrotten (a name that works), the Court of Appeals, relying on People v Cintron (75 NY2d 249 [1990]) held that permitting an adult complainant living in another state to testify via real-time, two-way video after finding that because of age and poor health he was unable to travel to New York to attend court was within the trial court's inherent powers under Judiciary Law § 2-b, absent any specific statutory authority for such… [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 pm
And for as long as we’ve been in the game, the bulk of federal criminal practice has been devoted to dealing with the Guidelines. [read post]
16 May 2018, 2:35 pm
In the case before the New York court, People v Perkins, border agents stopped a traveler at JFK International Airport after a flight from Canada. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:48 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 12:00 pm
While his success in that case, Bush v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 12:00 pm
While his success in that case, Bush v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 12:52 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:30 am
I've long thought the most consequential decision is also a sleeper case: Mallory v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:28 am
Take Our Poll#2 Justice Sotomayor v. #10 Tribal In-House Counsel Association Justice Sotomayor wins out in the people bracket, narrowly eliminating Judge Humetewa with 54 percent of the vote. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:28 am
Take Our Poll#2 Justice Sotomayor v. #10 Tribal In-House Counsel Association Justice Sotomayor wins out in the people bracket, narrowly eliminating Judge Humetewa with 54 percent of the vote. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
Not only was it a long time coming, it is also a long decision. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:47 am
They’ve been real heroes, great people to work with, and they put a lot of resources into this case. [read post]
