Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 44,349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
For example, mere identification by one familiar with an item of evidence may suffice where the item is distinct or unique (see People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 8:45 am
On May 9, 2013, in the City of Newburgh, the defendant was stopped as it was suspected that he was violating the City’s open-container law. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 8:51 am
If you think that’s crazy, consider it in light of what Justice Sotomayor wrote in her concurrence in the 2012 case of U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 12:43 pm
Wood v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
Katz v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 1:00 pm
Hernandez v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
From State v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Mercado, 307 F.3d 1226, 1229 (10th Cir. 2002) (determining that the automobile exception applied to warrantless search of van that was temporarily inoperable due to mechanical problems) and People v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 1:12 pm
Colvin, May 31, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit More Blog Entries: Mabry v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 6:19 pm
People v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:23 am
Florida dram shop liability laws exist so that those harmed by drunk drivers may collect damages from entities that knowingly served alcohol to minors or people known to be habitually dependent on alcohol. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:26 pm
Accordingly, the Court accurately explained in Presser v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 11:43 am
Jape; Stevo Design v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 6:10 am
Doe 1, and Capitol v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:26 pm
Some people who have been reading this blog know that I have been waiting for the decision in Evans v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 7:38 pm
The post Punish v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 3:31 pm
For crossing an intersection when the "DON'T WALK" sign was flashing.Yet, notwithstanding the incredibly tiny monetary interest at stake, the opinion may well have more practical significance to most of us than nearly every single one of the other appellate opinions we read.Pamela Monk got her $25 ticket because a police officer saw her enter the crosswalk when the red "DON'T WALK" sign was flashing, and was in it's "countdown" mode; e.g.,… [read post]
25 Nov 2016, 4:03 am
In the case of Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2016] EWHC 2864 (QB) Males J held that the right of a claimant to name the people who abused her prevailed over the rights of the perpetrators and others to private and family life. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:26 pm
This is an important statement because many people, such as the majority of the Federal Circuit panel in MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 2:20 pm
Bourne Co. v. [read post]
