Search for: "People v. Sample"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,949
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2023, 9:41 am
Social Media People v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:22 am
” Lee v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
Clark Holdings Ltd. v HOOPP Realty Inc. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Nucci v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:09 am
Blogs and Social Networking Sites The Third Wave of Internet Exceptionalism People v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:46 am
The key case on this is Ake v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
See Jaap van den Herik & Daniel V. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
United States also is a reminder of the real people behind the court's cases. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 2:56 pm
For better or worse, the courts have decided that legislatures are free to craft laws which provide for civil commitment of people who have dangerous mental abnormalities that "creates a likelihood of such conduct in the future if the person is not incapacitated" (Kansas v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:19 pm
People v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 11:27 am
If you are a member of the judiciary and wish to add your credibility to the project by letting us shamelessly use your name, please put the word "judge" in the title line of your email ...Pavel Pinkava's petition for leave to appeal against the Court of Appeal's ruling in LIFFE v Pinkava (judgment here; IPKat post here) has just been refused by the House of Lords. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 2:08 pm
The researchers in the current study note that their sample consisted of people who were both deceased and for whom there was evidence that playing high contact sports had caused some form of brain injury. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:51 am
" This sampling of reader comments illustrates the topic of our last blog post, which involved the idea of potential harm to others v. potential harm to oneself. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
The California Supreme Court has ruled that breath tests don't always mean someone is intoxicated even if the result is above the legal limit of .08, People v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 9:35 am
In the case of Birchfield v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 6:15 am
Some of the bigger changes this edition: We covered some major new developments, including AMG v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 10:37 pm
The TechnoLlama was first to let the IPKat know what the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit did last week in Perfect 10 v Amazon.com and Google Inc (full text of the judgment here).Left: not the TechnoLlama but the DeliLlamaThis decision is a must-read decision for anyone who is concerned with the development of copyright doctrine in the field of cached thumbnails. [read post]
