Search for: "People v. Score" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2021, 7:51 am by Kristian Soltes
Epic Antitrust Judge Doubts Apple Expert’s Amex ComparisonLaw360 – May 12, 2021 (subscription required) A California federal judge presiding over Epic’s high-stakes antitrust trial appeared skeptical Wednesday of a professor’s testimony that Apple’s anti-steering provisions are akin to restrictions upheld by the high court in Ohio v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
McKenzie, No. 07-1834 Sentence of forty-two months' imprisonment for distribution of cocaine base is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) district court incorrectly assigned two points to her Criminal History Category (CHC) score, thus rendering her ineligible for safety-valve relief under 18 U.S.C. section 3553(f); and 2) district court improperly credited computerized docket reports showing her past convictions. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Amnesty International has graded 11 of the most popular messaging apps in its Message Privacy Ranking, in which Snapchat and Skype received some of the lowest scores. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
”[6] Few people are just as satisfied to quietly read a musical score, in the way that they would a book, as they are to attend a performance of the work or listen to a recording; performances in music are just better. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Sandy Levinson
Taney didn't do it, but, if one can accept Story's similarly-motivated opinion in Prigg v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 1:19 am
A paper from another panel:Eric Claeys, George Mason University School of LawINS v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 5:50 am by Justin S. Daniel
District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction in Franciscan Alliance v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:22 pm by Nathan
So you can imagine how keen the legal world was to get the Supreme Court’s decision in Perry v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 6:48 am by SHG
But the smugs v. trolls view is a false equivalency. [read post]