Search for: "People v. Sharp"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2022, 12:06 pm
” In this regard, it is crucial to examine the judgment rendered in Rojer Mathew v South Indian Bank Ltd. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 6:49 am
Tabitha Wiggins v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 11:43 am
The Court of Appeal overturned that result, but the outcome was less noteworthy than the Court’s sharp criticism of what it called a “secret trial”. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:19 am
In Eugene Rose v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:00 am
In City of Richmond v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
An Employee is Laid-Off Because of COVID-19 In the recent decision Chalmers v Airways Transit Service Ltd. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:24 am
What he’s referring to is the Supreme Court’s 1942 opinion, written by Justice Frank Murphy, in Chaplinksy v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:45 am
Lamar Smith (R – Tex.), quickly drew sharp criticism from a wide range of advocacy groups. [read post]
25 May 2017, 4:03 pm
The high court gave constitutional blessing to the practice of plea bargaining that year in Brady v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Yet, the NDA Government has not officially communicated to the people why it thought it fit to bring in these twin Ordinances. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 2:56 am
Item (f) about claim charts should be left to the way the courts apply Huawei v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Ø Title VII v. the First AmendmentAvila v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:36 am
This is relevant to the judgment in Patel v Mirza (which had not been released at the date of our interview) relating to illegality: “The whole issue of how the Courts approach illegality as a defence to claims in contract and tort has been, to a degree, shaped by the Law Commission’s work on that area of law. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:13 pm
(The so-called “switch in time that saved nine,” which few people realize is a pun on the sewing parable of a “stitch in time saves nine. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The “tidal wave” of defamation cases on the internet[3] is matched by “tidal waves” in other areas of electronic communication e.g. child pornography (R v Sharpe [2001] 1 SCR 45 at [166]; see also “Sentencing Offenders convicted of child pornography and child abuse material offences”, JCR Monograph 34, September 2010, p. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 1:15 pm
That was the ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:33 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
