Search for: "Phillips v. United States"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
" U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, February 05, 2008 Phillips v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 7:53 am
" U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals, February 05, 2008 Phillips v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:46 am
United States Int'l Trade Comm'n, 366 F.3d 1311, 1320, 1322 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 11:49 am
SA-04-CR-611(1)FB, styled United States of America v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 2:15 pm
Phillip Morris v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
The United States Supreme Court, in Phillips Petroleum Co. v Shutts (472 US 797, 810-811 [1985]), succinctly addressed not only the status of an absent class action plaintiff, but also the relative detachment, and concomitant security, that characterizes that plaintiff's involvement in the litigation. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Young Moon, appeals from her conviction and sentence entered by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee on April 25, 2006, for three counts of health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 5:20 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 2:16 am
Steven Staker of the Junction City Public Defender Office won in State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
Phillips Electronics North America Corporation et al filed 05/11/07 1:07-cv-02690 DMS Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
Because statutes enacted under the Spending Clause of the United States Constitution must provide clear notice to the States of their liabilities should they decide to accept federal funding under those statutes, and because we conclude that NCLB fails to provide clear notice as to who bears the additional costs of compliance, we REVERSE the judgment of the district court and REMAND this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 08a0007p.06 Blackburn… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
Legislatures in the United States and abroad have passed increasingly restrictive and intrusive laws in order to protect the public from convicted sexual offenders. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 7:28 am
Further, since the United States Supreme Court decided State Farm Mut. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
This court upheld Smith's conviction and sentence in 2004, but the Supreme Court vacated his sentence in light of United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 12:44 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Sex Offender Annual Address Registration Law Does Not Violate Commerce Clause of Constitution
United States v. [read post]
