Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 1041 - 1060 of 4,539
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2019, 7:03 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Next fall, the Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral argument in County of Maui v. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 1:29 pm by Cannabis Law Group
Buying, selling or transporting those seeds out-of-state though is where things can get dicey. [read post]
20 Apr 2019, 10:37 am by Bill Marler
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenesisolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am by Patti Waller
Stx1, Stx2, Stx2c), and acts like the plant toxin ricin by inhibiting protein synthesis in endothelial and other cells.[17] Shiga toxin is one of the most potent toxins known.[18] In addition to Shiga toxins, E. coli O157:H7 produces numerous other putative virulence factors including proteins, which aid in the attachment and colonization of the bacteria in the intestinal wall and which can lyse red blood cells and liberate iron to help support E. coli metabolism.[19] E. coli O157:H7… [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 11:00 pm by Giesela Ruehl
  The plaintiffs sued the IFC (including in tort) in a US Federal District Court asserting that pollution from the plant harmed the surrounding air, land, and water. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
Missouri was the first state to prohibit plant and lab-grown alternatives from labeling those products as meat. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:47 pm
This proved to be true of Britain as well as the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 7:46 am by lcampbell@lawbc.com
  EPA states that the draft guidance is intended to “provide guidance on identifying product label claims that are considered to be plant regulator claims” by EPA under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and thereby distinguish claims that would not subject plant biostimulants (PBS) to regulation under FIFRA as plant regulators. [read post]