Search for: "Public Citizen v. Department of Justice" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,965
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2022, 2:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
This time, when Fresno County ran a background check, the California Department of Justice statewide telecommunications system reported plaintiff's prior hospitalization implicating his lifetime firearms ban under federal law. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  In Percoco, the Court held that a private citizen does not owe the public a duty to provide honest services simply because he has strong influence over government decisions, again abrogating contrary Second Circuit precedent. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
The Justice Department urged the Supreme Court not to hear the case. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
But, it had also failed him because of deeply entrenched practices and biases.[7][…] The Commission found that “each component of the system—every check and balance-failed from the Sydney Police Force to the Department of the Attorney General”. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
But, it had also failed him because of deeply entrenched practices and biases.[7][…] The Commission found that “each component of the system—every check and balance-failed from the Sydney Police Force to the Department of the Attorney General”. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
The law also requires the administrators to submit quarterly returns to the Michigan Department of the Treasury and to keep relevant records. [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:42 am
" With respect to claims of absolute immunity under common-law, the Appellate Division noted a ruling by the Court of Appeals concluded that a private citizen speaking at a public hearing "was not conferred with absolute privilege because, unlike members of the ... [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 7:53 am
There are very able and intelligent lawyers in the Justice Department all the way up to the top. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:36 pm
Kagan's 1st oral argument before the Court came last September in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:43 am by Kyle Persaud
During the time of COVID-19, governments across the country have sought to restrict the behavior of private citizens and groups in ways that many citizens could not have imagined even a year ago. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Simon LazarusIn my previous blog post, I explained why Chief Justice Roberts’ 2012 decision in NFIB v. [read post]