Search for: "RICHARDSON v. STATE"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2016, 2:30 pm
Stated, “We at OCR remain particularly concerned with unaddressed risks that may lead to impermissi [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Twitter’s policy states that users “may not threaten violence against an individual or a group of people” and the social network prohibits “the glorification of violence. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:21 pm
See, Businesses Must Confirm & Clean Up Health Plan ACA & Other Compliance Following Supreme Court’s King v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm
Health plans, their employer and other sponsors and fiduciaries, health insurers, health care providers, health care clearinghouses and their business associates should study and learn from the just announced, record-setting $16 million resolution agreement between health insurance giant, Anthem, Inc., to resolve Department of Health & Human Services Office of Civil Rights (OCR) charges that Anthem, Inc. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 2:47 pm
The likelihood of state statutory or regulatory restrictions on insured arrangements is particularly likely because of the heavy regulation of these products by states including the widespread incorporation of ACA mandates into state insurance laws and regulations in response to the Market Reform provisions of the ACA. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:43 am
Dinwoodie: state of law or practice? [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
A useful summary of this can be found in a case called Flannery & Anor v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd [1999] EWCA Civ 81, where the Court of Appeal said : (1) The duty is a function of due process, and therefore of justice. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm
A new disability discrimination lawsuit filed by the U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 5:55 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a judgment and order in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
Assistant Secretary of State David R. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:58 am
So in Myers v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 12:58 pm
It would try and block its use at the state and local police levels by tying the ability to get federal monies in grant funding to the state agreement to ban use of biometric technology in its jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
Businesses that did not file required retirement plan returns should contact legal counsel about whether they can come into compliance and avoid painful penalties by taking advantage of a newly announced Internal Revenue Service (IRS) low-cost penalty relief program for IRS penalties and a Department of Labor (DOL) voluntary compliance resolution program for Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) penalties. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 3:25 am
In its complaint in EEOC v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:59 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division (EEOC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 1:18 pm
An older study by Richardson (1961) found no significant loss at doses up to 14 times (56 kGy) the maximum approved FDA dose (4 kGy) for spinach. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 2:22 pm
In the Express Scripts, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The Bradford Hill Predicate: Ruling Out Random and Systematic Error In two recent posts, I spent some time discussing a recent law review, which had some important things to say about specific causation.[1] One of several points from which I dissented was the article’s argument that Sir Austin Bradford Hill had not made explicit that ruling out random and systematic error was required before assessing his nine “viewpoints” on whether an association was causal. [read post]
