Search for: "Raymond v. Raymond" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2011, 7:09 am by Maxwell Kennerly
It may have been sexual assault, too; Raymond Clark submitted an Alford plea to that. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 2:54 am by Laura Sandwell
On Wednesday 29 Jan 2014 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: R v Mackle (Nos. 1, 2 and 3), and R v McLaughlin; In the matter of an application of Raymond Brownlee for Judicial Review; and A v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 10:36 am by lennyesq
Raymond Kelly Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Labor & Employment Law and Public Benefits The People v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Stringer At 49 Grove 49 Grove Street at Bleecker Street in the West Village Conveniently located by the 1 train at the Christopher Street Station, the A B C D E F V trains at the West 4th Street Station and the PATH train at the 9th Street Station $250 Benefactor, $100 Patron, $50 Sponsor, $20 Guest  Host committee in formation:Benefactors: Abbe Gluck * Alisa Schierman * Andrew Tulloch * Carlos A. [read post]
9 May 2009, 6:00 am
Raymond has the longest tenure, serving on the board since 1987. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, Plaintiff, -against- LESTER YOUNG, RAYMOND MAR, MARILYN HARRIS, AKA MARILYN SELLER, US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, et al,  the argument succeeds for plaintiff. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:36 pm by Blog Editorial
Judgments outstanding The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: R (SK) (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 10-11 Feb 2010 JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and another v Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) Anstalt des Oeffentlichen Rechts, heard 11 November 2010 Al Rawi and others (Respondents) v The Security Service and others (Appellants), heard 24 -27 January 2011 Home Office (Appellant) v Tariq (Respondent), heard 24 –… [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 5:47 pm by Ray Dowd
   I am now on my second trip to the Second Circuit on Bakalar v Vavra. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court properly granted defendant Litchfield Cavo's motion to dismiss, since there was no evidence that Cavo, as superseding counsel, either contributed to the loss or could have done anything to correct the errors of predecessor counsel (see Waggoner v Caruso, 68 AD3d 1 [2009], affd 14 NY3d 874 [2010]; Rivas v Raymond Schwartzberg & Assoc., PLLC, 52 AD3d 401 [2008]). [read post]