Search for: "Read v. People" Results 1041 - 1060 of 21,603
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2013, 10:33 am by Josh Bell
In 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:19 am by Public Employment Law Press
On October 16, 2008,...click to Continue Reading…NYPD Disqualification for Loud Exhaust or Tinted Windows- Sometimes younger people (often men), accumulate summonses or moving violations for “loud exhaust” or “tinted windows”. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:19 am by Public Employment Law Press
On October 16, 2008,...click to Continue Reading…NYPD Disqualification for Loud Exhaust or Tinted Windows- Sometimes younger people (often men), accumulate summonses or moving violations for “loud exhaust” or “tinted windows”. [read post]
4 Dec 2021, 9:54 am by Alicia Maule
The post Christina Swarns Exposes Risk of A Right to Fair Trial in New York Times on SCOTUS Case Shinn v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 5:12 pm
” The Miranda rights, named after the landmark Supreme Court case Miranda v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
" Here is the Summary of Argument from our brief, though you can read the entire brief here: Using characters based on real people in works of fiction is a longstanding practice protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 10:31 am
Indeed, from reading some comments in the web versions of the press, many people find this decision surprising. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 10:13 am
So I know many people will find it hard to root for either side.But it's also a very interesting patent and antitrust dispute, and for those in the hard core intellectual property field, a definite must read. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The California Supreme Court had a precedent from 2011, People v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 7:16 am by Frank Pasquale
Lehmann describes the dubious reasoning behind the court’s 1886 fiat, in Santa Clara County v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 7:48 am by Florian Mueller
Oracle America (petitioner v. respondent as opposed to plaintiff v. defendant): the Android maker's non-copyrightability defense has a snow flake's chance in hell.I wrote yesterday's triumphant post on the basis of having listened to the hearing on C-SPAN Radio (over the web). [read post]