Search for: "Read v. Social Security Administration" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,277
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Are nursing sled dog puppies sufficiently controlled if left at their mother's teat and the mother herself is securely tethered? [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:17 am by Alex Wohl
In 2002, the Department of Transportation launched a joint criminal investigation with the Social Security Administration and those two agencies along with the FAA shared information about pilots, including their applications for disability benefits and related medical information. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:20 am by P.J. Blount
Subsequently, respondent applied to the Social Security Administration (SSA) and received long-term disability benefits on thebasis of his HIV status. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:53 pm by Lyle Denniston
Davis in 1937, upholding the original Social Security Act, the Chief Justice noted that that involved a tax challenge and yet the government gave up its right to block that lawsuit. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:29 am by Jeff Marshall
The federal Medicaid statute is found in Title XIX of the Social Security Act which is codified in federal law beginning at 42 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 9:02 pm by Lyle Denniston
Davis, upholding under the Spending Clause the payroll tax that was then and still is a part of the system of financing Social Security. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am by George M. Wallace
Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), the Supreme Court concluded that a full evidentiary hearing is not required before terminating disability benefits (a property right) under the Social Security Act. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am by George M. Wallace
Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), the Supreme Court concluded that a full evidentiary hearing is not required before terminating disability benefits (a property right) under the Social Security Act. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am by George M. Wallace
Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), the Supreme Court concluded that a full evidentiary hearing is not required before terminating disability benefits (a property right) under the Social Security Act. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:57 am
All of these questions are posed in the context of a particular chapter or section of the Report, and some will only make sense when read in that context. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:22 am by Karwan Eskerie
It would cause administrative chaos, and would inevitably have significant economic implications, if the regulations were now to be quashed. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:50 am by P.J. Blount
– Homeland Security Watch Lawmakers Take Closer Look at DHS’ Social Media Monitoring – Communia Anonymous Promises Regularly Scheduled Friday Attacks – Threat Level The Regulatory Provisions of the Cybersecurity Act of 2012 – Lawfare [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:42 am by Rosalind English
Stott v Thomas Cook Operators and British Airways Plc [2012] EWCA Civ 66 – read judgment If you need reminding of what it feels like when the candy-floss of human rights is abruptly snatched away, take a flight. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The only available guidance derives from DPP v Collins ([2006] UKHL 40), an appeal from the Divisional Court. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
As noted below, the Administrative Court will hear the appeal in the case of R (Chambers) v DPP on Wednesday. [read post]