Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 1041 - 1060 of 12,754
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2009, 5:23 am
§ 1252(a)(2)(B), stripped courts of jurisdiction to review any “decision or action of the Attorney General . . . the authority for which is specified under this subchapter to be in the discretion of” the Attorney General. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:25 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky and Mark J. Levin
A group of 19 state attorneys general and the District of Columbia attorney general have sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer expressing the AGs’ “strong opposition” to S.J. [read post]
10 Mar 2025, 12:32 pm by Paul L. Singer
How does the Michigan Attorney General’s Office operate? [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 5:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Bank N.A., 186 AD3d at 1039 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see generally Rider, 192 AD3d at 1562). [read post]
At first blush, alas, it does not appear that the Court is primed to apply that reading. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Sherica Celine
Subchapter V Decision Tracker Refer to this tracker for the latest case law on Subchapter V. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:33 pm by Richard M. Re
And he further suggested that the attorneys general simply “don’t want to have to defend suits” that immunity might block. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 12:34 pm by Corrie Buck and Mara Curtis
The Court examined whether the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) preempted California court precedent, which invalidated contractual waivers of representative claims under California’s Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (“PAGA”). [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 2:49 pm by David Faustman
CLS Transportation, 59 Cal. 4th 348, decided that the waiver of class action participation in an arbitration agreement was enforceable, but the waiver of a representative action under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) was not. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 11:22 pm by Donald Dinnie
This blog was co-authored by: Bwanika Lwanga, Candidate Attorney Recently the Supreme Court of Appeal in Rautini v Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Case no. 853/2020) [2021] ZASCA 158 (8 November 2021) reaffirmed the general rule regarding the drawing of inferences. [read post]