Search for: "Ring v. Ring" Results 1041 - 1060 of 2,651
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2013, 5:28 pm by Mack Sperling
If the issue of the invocation of the parent's attorney-client privilege by a subsidiary is ringing a distant bell in your mind, you might be thinking of Judge Gale's recent opinion in SCR-Tech v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:31 pm by Corynne McSherry
Unfortunately, a federal district court did just that in the latest iteration of Oracle v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:20 pm
Luke Maunder (Bristows LLP) reports on the decision which will be interest to anyone who loves color combination trade marks or trying to figure out how to precisely and clearly ring fence the scope of trade mark protection Conference Report: Should you arbitrate FRAND rates? [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:41 am
On 25 March 2019, the Australian Trade Marks Office (ATMO) handed down a decision in Comite International Olympique v Tempting Brands Netherlands BV. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 1:45 pm
The Supreme Court made that clear when it recognized, in a landmark 1982 decision called NAACP v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
The IPKat has reported a few times on the attention-riveting case of Resolution v Lundbeck. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:48 am
Cochrane [1993] Crim LR 98, which was applied in Ireland in relation to mobile phone records by People (DPP) v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 9:44 am by Vera Ranieri
Founded in 2013, the company creates fitness trackers, housed in a ring worn on your finger. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:29 am
Dolly Wendell, Opposition No. 912379415 [Section 2(d) opposition to the mark YOUR WORK FORCE IS YOUR SALESFORCE for "Education services ... in the fields of networking, relationship building, collaboration, leadership, management, education, sales, communication, corporate and personal assessment and measurement, and professional and personal development" and for related  printted publications [SALESFORCE disclaimed] in view of the allegedly famous, registered mark SALESFORCE for… [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:37 pm by Tony Kakooza
These two cases clearly spelt out that copyright law and image rights are not necessarily the same thing.In comes Asege Winnie v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:40 am
From the Netherlands, patent attorney Bart van Wezenbeek (V.O.) took advantage of the "no-patent" instruction as follows: A talented kitten called Katedisclosed her invention on a dateHer tomboy said “Cool,But you’re such a fool.Since for patenting it is now too late”.Charles Quekett's offering is zany enough to qualify for publication: A talented kitten called Kate,Her oppositions were always just too-late.She gave ‘drid a ring;Changed… [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:37 pm
The evidence at trial revealed that the defendant bit the victim on the left ring finger. [read post]