Search for: "Rose v. Rose"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 3,917
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
Source Perrier v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:13 am
Rose Hughes publishes the first part of the review of the “Pregabalin: Where stand plausibility and Swiss-formclaims” event hold at UCL a “great and good pass comment” on Warner Lambert v Actavis. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:27 am
Typically, the entire tap unit had to be replaced to effect this change.Kat enjoying the output from a cable tap unitCommon General Knowledge and NoveltyFollowing on from Regen Lab v Estar [2019] EWHC (Pat) (Summarised by GuestKat Rose Hughes earlier this week here), HHJ Hacon again raised the question of whether the CGK given as expert witness testimony was meant as CGK in the UK. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 2:59 am
Audit Fees: New Standards Cause Modest Increase This “Audit Fee Survey” from ferf & Workiva reports that audit fees rose by about 2.5% last year – mostly due to implementing the new revenue recognition and lease standards, but also because of M&A activity and more stringent PCAOB inspections. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
Every 40 seconds a business falls victim to a ransomware attack, according to a recent story by the Forbes Technology Council, per a security bulletin posted by the cybersecurity firm Kaspersky Lab, which stated that the number of attacks rose from every two minutes in early 2016. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
Anderson, a Q&A moderated by Brookings Senior Fellow Frank Rose, and a panel discussion led by Michael O’Hanlon of the Brookings Foreign Policy Program. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:20 am
, GuestKat Rose analyses another controversy associated with claim forms (following the UK Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis (IPKat post here)) concerning the nature of the 'medical products' to which they can be applied. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 5:09 am
Defendant Proskauer Rose (“Proskauer”) represented A&O in that 2011 action. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:02 am
That said, I also see serious issues in Huawei v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:28 am
During yesterday’s argument in Knick v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:53 pm
Even in the case of H3H3 v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:27 am
Pictures, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:56 pm
The Northern District of California case, Patel v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 11:47 am
A 1985 precedent, Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:42 am
Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit’s 1995 decision Crow Tribe v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:29 am
IPKat's summary of the Supreme Court decision (Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56) can be found here. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 8:13 pm
., Nov. 2, 2018, case no. 18A410); -Kelsey Cascadia Rose Juliana, et al. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 2:35 pm
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
