Search for: "Rules of Evidence v. Rules"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 59,609
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2024, 9:44 am
Markers like these give speech the benefit of clear context…we can safely presume that speech on a “personal” page is personal (absent significant evidence indicating that a post is official). [read post]
4 May 2024, 12:08 pm
In Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 11:09 am
From Hughes v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 7:12 am
Hendrix, v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm
The evidence? [read post]
3 May 2024, 10:53 am
In the case Jones v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am
Under this theory, a rule that "Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis" is evidence of a Title VI violation means that a university could be punished under Title VI for allowing speech drawing such comparisons. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:38 am
The parties quickly settled after this ruling (why did they wait?). [read post]
3 May 2024, 7:21 am
I couldn’t help but think of this point after reading Judge Young’s summary judgment ruling in the excessive fee case brought against Boston College, Sellers v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
This helps explain how drugs can be regulated in ways that that defy sound medical evidence of their health effects. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:46 am
Consider Bauer and Braxton Minerals II v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 3:26 am
Again, it is unclear what evidence the EC has on this. [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:36 pm
[1] Vance v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:25 pm
See page 107 of FDA’s 1st Quarter FY2024 MDUVA V Report (here). [read post]
2 May 2024, 2:27 pm
Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 12:22 pm
Indus. v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:49 am
I’ll leave an analysis of that ruling to hyper-motivated readers. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:35 am
The court relied on In re Estate of Jurgens, 31 N.W.2d 633 (Iowa 1948) and Noe v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 7:50 am
Robbins reaffirms the Seminole Rock rule that courts must accept an agency’s interpretation of its own regulation unless the interpretation is plainly erroneous. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:55 am
Inc. v. [read post]