Search for: "SMITH v. SMITH" Results 1041 - 1060 of 16,211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In its opinion today in Smith v. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:42 pm
Sabol, 517 F.3d 29, 31 (1st Cir. 2008), and in Judge Raggi's well-reasoned dissent in Levine v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- While much has been written about the effect of the post-grant review provisions of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (2012) in invalidating U.S. patents, the change in the law most responsible for how easy it has become to invalidate patents is arguably the Supreme Court's decision in Dickinson v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Nevertheless, the provisions of the 1952 Act remain in force for any application filed prior to March 16, 2013, and the Federal Circuit's recent decision in Dey, L.P. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Most recently, the question before the Federal Circuit in Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Noonan -- Last week, the Federal Circuit overturned an obviousness determination in an inter partes review by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in OSI Pharmaceuticals LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 9:50 pm by Patent Docs
" all would be apt subtitles for any article discussing the Supreme Court's decision today in Helsinn v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:52 pm by Douglas R. Griess
Back on January 17, 2009, I posted a blog on a recent ruling my office obtained from the District Court for the District of Colorado in Smith v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 5:08 pm
Anna Nicole Smith’s tragic death (see here) put a spotlight once again on the record-shattering trust-and-estates litigation she and her former step-son, E. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am by INFORRM
The decision of Mr Justice Peter Smith in Sports Direct International plc v Rangers International Football Club plc and another [2016] EWHC 85 (Ch) to refuse to commit the respondent for contempt for alleged breach of an injunction shows the caution that the court will sometimes show when it comes to seeking to enforce injunctive relief. [read post]