Search for: "STATE v BUSH" Results 1041 - 1060 of 4,543
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2018, 6:27 am
Not only do you need 2/3 supermajority in both Houses of Congress, you are defeated if one house in the legislature of 13 states says no. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Benjamin Alter
The Supreme Court has acknowledged, most recently in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 1:10 pm by Robert L. Abell
The Court held that Supreme Court precedent, Kirby v.Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 (1972) and United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Harvard Law Review Blog, Richard Hasen suggests that by answering “no, with no explanation,” to “Pennsylvania Republicans’ calls to put on hold the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s order redrawing the state’s congressional district lines to cure a partisan gerrymander,” “the Court dodged a question it has refused to wade into since the disputed 2000 presidential election culminating in the Court’s… [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Russell Spivak
Bush, in which the Supreme Court ruled that “detainees who were brought [to Guantanamo Bay] involuntarily were entitled under the Constitution to seek habeas corpus relief because ‘[i]n every practical sense Guantanamo is not abroad; it is within the constant jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Sarah Grant
Bush, allowing Guantánamo detainees to challenge the legality of their detention. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:13 am by Robert Chesney
True, Justice Anthony Kennedy in Boumediene v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 4:58 am by Colby Pastre
In 2021 and 2022, several provisions are scheduled to take effect which would raise taxes on business investment in the United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:55 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
In 2002, the Bush administration cited as justification for its adoption of enhanced interrogation techniques the 1978 European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) decision in Ireland v. [read post]