Search for: "Senior v. Hope"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,385
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2011, 12:18 pm
Such was the case in McNeal v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm
Lord Hope, giving the leading judgment for the majority, said that the key issue was whether or not the procedural requirement was sufficiently closely linked to the authority to detain. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 6, 2010 SLT 261 and Cadder v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 7:56 am
Sharma v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 8:28 am
Kalar, Senior Litigator N.D. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:59 pm
And in public speeches and concurrences, senior D.C. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:04 pm
We hope shortly to provide – from public sources – a slightly more accurate list. [read post]
12 May 2011, 11:42 am
The Supreme Court of Canada today denied a leave to appeal application from a pair of Toronto law firms over a disputed $837,000 legal bill.The decision follows the Ontario Court of Appeal’s October 2010 majority decision in Echo Energy Canada Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 4:02 pm
") United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
With a Preface from the President of the International Bar Association, the book also brings together further chapters from a diverse group of senior and up-and-coming academics and practitioners expert in these fields: - Preface (by Akira Kawamura) - Investment Arbitration in Asia: Five Perspectives on Law and Practice (Luke Nottage and J. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 8:28 am
Carrns optimism seems to be unfounded, given that senior threat researcher, Kevin Stevens from the security firm Trend Micro, “said that the forums indicated the hackers had a database containing the personal information, and that they were hoping to sell it “for upwards of $100,000. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 4:18 am
Okay, so I’m back from vacation and trying to stay abreast of what’s going on with the Kramer & Kaslow mass joinder lawsuits, which are being tried by attorney Phillip Kramer whom I interviewed in late February after I received copies of mailings from homeowners soliciting participation in a lawsuit settlement that I found deceptive or misleading. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:11 pm
See Gideon v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 12:40 pm
More recently, in Grutter v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 9:38 am
Supreme Court’s groundbreaking decision in Graham v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
" That court offered a word of caution with regard to decisions as to habitual residence: "It is greatly to be hoped that the courts will resist the temptation to develop detailed and restrictive rules as to habitual residence, which might make it as technical a term of art as common-law domicile. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm
The case was Cullen v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 9:04 pm
Back to Matthew Kluger v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:01 pm
Proceeds will go towards renovations to Eric’s house including a handicapped ramp, bathroom, and an additional room.52 Fest is about progress, hope, growth, positivity, selflessness, love, and the ability to envision a brighter future. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral… [read post]
