Search for: "Shapiro v. State" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
The five-page State Department memo was signed by 100 State and U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro weighs in on Frank v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
He stated that it wasn't bad as he had expected, given the war-time circumstances: "We have 75 students, and we haven't had to admit any women. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 5:06 am by Edith Roberts
” At American Thinker, Deborah La Fetra maintains that the “Gift Clause[s]” in state constitutions would prevent states from enacting “workarounds” to the court’s recent decision in Janus v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
" In other words, could United States antitrust authorities have done more? [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 7:44 am
In the thinly-reasoned opinion of Stuart v. [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 4:16 am by jonathanturley
Chief Justice John Roberts cited Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 4:12 am by jonathanturley
The focus of the letter is the fact that Barrett voted with the majority in the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:41 am by Peter Mahler
Another potentially important issue awaiting further developments in Golder is whether, in accordance with LLC Law § 402 (c) (3) as construed earlier this year by an appellate court in Shapiro v Ettenson, the respondents holding a majority of the membership interests could bind the petitioner to the LLC’s operating agreement providing for perpetual duration notwithstanding he never signed it. [read post]