Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp" Results 1041 - 1060 of 3,730
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
Following the decisions in Gulati v MGN Limited [2017] QB 149 and Lloyd v Google LLC [2022] AC 1217, one may have thought that a misuse of private information claim was more advantageous. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:22 pm by Florian Mueller
Indeed, component-level deals happen, but Daimler itself ended up taking one car-level license after the other (Sharp => Conversant => Nokia => Avanci). [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 2:42 am by INFORRM
Date Case Name Reference Court Subject Matter Posts Final win -  C or D 15.12.10 Shergill v Purewal Sir Charles Gray Libel  Summary Determination D 13.12.10 Smith v ADVFN [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB) Tugendhat J Libel  Summary Determination D 3.12.10 Lait v Evening Standard (No.2) [2010] EWHC 3239 (QB) Eady J Libel  Fair Comment Summary Determination D 24.11.10 Daniels v BBC [2010] EWHC 3057 (QB) Sharp J Libel  Strike… [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Also at Volokh Conspiracy (via How Appealing), Will Baude passes on Todd Henderson’s thoughts about Sharp v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 8:32 am by INFORRM
 The trial took place in May 2012 and in a judgment handed down in December 2012 ([2012] EWHC 3721 (QB)) Sharp J found for the claimant and awarded him damages of £65,000 and his costs. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
On 17 October 2017 the Court of Appeal (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson) heard the appeal in the case of Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:26 am by Lucinda Cunningham
In R (Detention Action) v First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) [2015] EWCA Civ 840, the Court of Appeal declared that the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Rules 2014 (“the 2014 Rules”) (which were materially identical to the 2005 Rules) were ultra vires. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:06 pm by INFORRM
Flood v Times Newspapers (Master of the Rolls, Leveson P and Sharp LJ), heard 9 July 2014 (Case Tracker). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:52 am by Adam Levitin
 The case is important because it says that post-AT&T v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 10:52 pm by Florian Mueller
The reasonable and rational thing for automotive supplier Continental to do now would be to recognize that its meritless "antitrust" action against Avanci and some of its licensors (Nokia, Sharp, Optis) is--and always has been--an error. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 2:57 pm
Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am by INFORRM
Tinkler v Ferguson, heard 3 April 2019 (Longmore, Sharp and Bean LJJ) [read post]