Search for: "Sharp v. Sharp"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 4,115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2012, 7:58 am
In last week’s case (Demidas v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 1:29 pm
Sharp Capital, Inc., 952 F. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Sharp LJ is a media law specialist, but the lead judgment was in fact given by Davis LJ. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Sharp LJ is a media law specialist, but the lead judgment was in fact given by Davis LJ. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
Sharp LJ is a media law specialist, but the lead judgment was in fact given by Davis LJ. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 6:41 am
Case Citation: Griner v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
The Court of Appeal unanimously dismissed Mr Khuja’s appeal, with Sharp LJ giving the only judgment. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 7:25 am
That said, one is mindful of the fact that as noted by South Africa’s constitutional court in relation to patent validity challenges in Ascendis Animal Health (Pty) Limited v Merck Sharp Dohme Corporation and 2 Other [2019] ZACC 41 (paragraph 100), in the absence of substantive IP examination systems to balance the monopoly conferred by IPRs, validity challenges should be encouraged as they offer an avenue for IPRs to be tested. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 2:56 pm
Scott v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 8:44 am
Watson v. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 5:47 am
They look a little different, but the Dutch Supreme Courtsays that they should be treated just the same Yesterday afternoon, the AmeriKat's Dutch friend, Professor Tobias Cohen Jehoram (De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek) sent her, hot of the press, a copy of the Dutch Supreme Court's decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Teva delivered yesterday morning. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alexander Keyssar, Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:12 pm
Student V goes to the office again as Student B is now threatening to kill him daily and throwing sharp objects at him. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:53 pm
” Jeffrey Sharp v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:27 pm
In the lower courts, in addition to numerous noncapital decisions of note this week, there is one capital decision, Jason Michael Sharp v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 3:17 am
On the other hand, if you knew of a trust or fiduciary duty and deliberately assisted someone to break it, you can, following Brunei Airlines v Tan , be held liable only if you acted dishonestly. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:32 pm
The order in Al-Oshan v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:18 am
Okoli v City of Baltimore -- Appeal from the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2008, 9:14 pm
Cox v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:11 am
Sharp LJ in the Court of Appeal provided a relatively learned analysis of the development of the Article 8 and public law jurisprudence (no disrespect intended – it did not need to be any more than relatively learned) to demonstrate that the jurisprudence had moved on since Wandsworth LBC v Winder [1985] AC 461, such that an occupier was entitled to raise questions relating to either Article 8 or s 11 in response to a decision to serve a notice to quit and the… [read post]
