Search for: "Shorter v. State"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
L’Anza Int’l and Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 7:17 am
The Ohio Supreme Court found the state’s process of school funding (using residual general Assembly funds supplemented by local (real property) tax revenues) to be unconstitutional in DeRolph v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:45 am
So my reworked materials start with a section on the history and the development of the Fourth Amendment, starting with Entick v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:07 pm
(Save Livermore Downtown v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
One might arguably understand and appreciate the Vreeland holding in an era when the law of wrongful death was still in its relative infancy; human life spans were shorter, and given the state of technology, industry, and law, accidental death was a more common part of the American landscape than it is today. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
Amount of Shares -- The amount of shares offered can be stated as an exact number or as a percentage of the outstanding shares. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 1:38 am
In this case--as I brought up at a recent Madrid conference I attended via Teams--the AG opinion is not just one key player's views: more than 20 EU and European Economic Area Member States, the EU Council (where the governments of the EU Member States cast their votes), the European Parliament, and the European Commission took such positions as well. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 5:31 am
The termination right trumps written agreements -- even agreements which state they are in perpetuity. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 10:29 am
A glaring example is the highly debated and publicized case of Owens v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
In the case of Maison v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 2:46 am
Boskalis referred to a hypothetical scenario where the period inserted in Box 24 is shorter than 21 days, arguing that there would be no commercial basis for barring Charterers’ defence for failure to respond within such a short period. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had little justification in the internationallaw the United States claimed to be upholding, and the United States prosecuted the wars whileindifferent to the civilian casualties they imposed. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:30 am
As the Guidelines and the Protocol state, public access to virtual hearings remains ever important. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 9:28 am
On the 26 April 2017, the US Supreme Court will hear arguments on this issue in Sandoz v Amgen. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
The end result of that litigation was that both parties agreed there was a contract between them and that it was governed by the law of the state of Pennsylvania (where it had been litigated). [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:22 am
Following Rules 71(1) and 132(2) EPC, any period for reply by the applicant must not be shorter than 2 months (see also T 246/08, point 4 of the reasons). [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 4:30 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
No trade dress this time.This first Apple v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 12:54 pm
New York State Restaurant Assoc. v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm
First up was my TCD colleague, Dr Neville Cox, who spoke about the background to the current State of Irish blasphemy law (on which you should see his magisterial, but eminently readable, tome, as well as the shorter, accessible, paper he prepared for the Convention (pdf)). [read post]
