Search for: "Smith v. Texas"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2012, 8:08 am
Smith v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:18 am
Wiggins v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 8:10 pm
Smith, a case it ended up dismissing on procedural grounds. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 5:59 pm
The district court temporarily blocked the state from enforcing the two requirements, agreeing with Planned Parenthood that both requirements bore a close resemblance to the Texas rules that the Supreme Court deemed unconstitutional in 2016, in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Smiths Medical, 165 P.3d 433, 438 (Wyo. 2007). [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:44 pm
In a 1979 case called Smith v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
Smith was detained on 6 May 2023 for 14 hours. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:44 pm
—San Antonio 1998, pet. denied); Smith v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 12:31 pm
Beyer’s forthcoming article Estate Planning Ramifications of Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 9:24 am
The Supreme Court's 2008 ruling in Baze v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:36 am
" Similar language appears in Texas Department of Community Affairs v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
” Commentary comes from Arthur Sapper at Ogletree Deakins, Coates Lear at The National Law Review, and Carlton Smith at Procedurally Taxing. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant's defences and counterclaims granted in part; antitrust claims severed: Fiber Systems International v Applied Optical Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion to compel denied - non-compliance with 'meet and confer' rule: Konami Digital Entertainment Co v Harmonix Music… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int’l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant’s defences and counterclaims granted in p [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 12:31 pm
Does Harris have immunity to prosecution under Trump v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 4:31 pm
App. 1896), but the Texas Supreme Court had disapproved of this decision in Marshall v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 11:10 am
University of Texas. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
In Stanley v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:59 am
Smith v. [read post]
