Search for: "South Carolina v. United States" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,557
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2012, 8:34 pm by The Charge
Sandford - questions never raised, never briefed, not germane and contrary to common belief at the time - was that Congress could not regulate slavery in federal territories and that no person of African descent could be a citizen of the United States or any state therein.So, in 1856, four years before South Carolina would secede from the Union ultimately bringing Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Texas, Georgia, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee and… [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 8:34 am by Lyle Denniston
  That decision, in the case of United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Plumer instead voted for his friend, Secretary of State John Quincy Adams for President and United States Ambassador to Britain, William Rush as Vice-President, even though neither Adams nor Rush were candidates for those offices. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:48 am by Mark Walsh
As I wrote earlier this week, the descendants of plaintiffs in a companion case from South Carolina believe that Brown should be renamed Briggs v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am by Schachtman
The record of medical boards and professional societies’ efforts to curb abusive medico-legal testimony is uneven.[1] In one closely followed case, the North Carolina Medical Board revoked a physician’s license on the basis of finding of “unprofessional conduct” in the form of testimony given in a medical malpractice case. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 12:45 pm by Unknown
"A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study on Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge and Access to Services of Arab and Kurdish Syrian Refugee Young Women Living in an Urban Setting in Lebanon," International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 18 (Sept. 2021) [open access] - Authors (3) = Germany Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 1:47 pm by Katie Barlow
Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States Amy Coney Barrett took the judicial oath Tuesday morning to become the Supreme Court’s 115th justice, joining the bench at a time when the court is being asked to rule on pressing issues related to next week’s presidential election. [read post]
26 May 2020, 8:00 am by FHH Law
EEO Public File Reports – All radio and television station employment units with five or more full-time employees and located in California, Illinois, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Wisconsin must place EEO Public File Reports in their OPIFs. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
The Austin-based federal Western District Court for Texas found the United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 2:17 pm by @travelblawg
Code § 39A “Aiming a laser pointer at an aircraft” in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:45 pm by Alfred Brophy
 One of them, for instance, is United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
  Potential Blanket Legal Barriers Here is the text of Section 3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any S [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 11:31 am by Taylor Daily
In a notable segment which echoed the words of South Carolina Party Chair Jaime Harrison, Cuomo stated that the Republican argument of wanting to “take us back to the old days, the good old days” would take us back to a time “before the Civil Rights Act … before minimum wage and worker protection laws … before Roe v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm by Kevin
South Carolina, No. 04-1327 (argued Feb. 22, 2006) (Thomas, J.) [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
South Carolina, 237 U.S. 180 (1915)..............................................................2-3 Morales v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
: The Case for Critical Histories as Method in Decolonizing South African Legal EducationLunch 12:30-2:00 (St. [read post]