Search for: "State of North Carolina v. United States"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 2,927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2023, 11:18 am
The report comes as abortion bans are being struck down in many states, including Nebraska, North Carolina, and South Carolina. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
’” And, as they go on, “[t]he North Carolina Constitution makes clear [that the] . . . legislative power of the State shall be vested in the General Assembly [and that] the state judiciary is not the ‘Legislature’ in North Carolina, nor any part of it. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am
Supreme Court case is Sierra Chemical v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:42 am
Ever since the Supreme Court of the United State decided NCAA v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:36 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 7:50 am
United States, 517 U.S. 806, 813 (1996); and State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:38 am
In State v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 8:49 am
In Szalai v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 6:48 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 11:38 am
Common Cause [docket] and sent the North Carolina partisan gerrymandering case back to the lower court for further consideration in light of its recent decision in Gill v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 12:03 pm
United States, 338 U. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
" United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:26 am
In the 2018 case, Murphy v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 6:46 am
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 10:54 am
State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:18 am
Webb v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
§ 1983 suit from the Eastern District of North Carolina, the plaintiff was a pretrial detainee in custody of the Wake County Sheriff. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 1:34 pm
North Carolina, the United States Supreme Court found that a police officer's mistaken belief that the law required two working brake lights, when it only required one, which led to a stop and consent search of a vehicle, was reasonable, and as such, the product of the search would not be suppressed. [read post]
