Search for: "State v. Carbone" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,578
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2013, 8:32 am by WSLL
GREENCORE PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC; GREENCORE PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 7:54 am by Scott Deatherage
  My practice has involved projects and issues in states all across the country, but I decided to focus on those that state or federal agnencies issue in Texas. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 8:39 am
What I did find was a 2007 Supreme Court decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 6:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “ Betz commenced an action against the respondent, and multiple successor attorneys who served the executor and/or the estate, in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entitled Debra Betz, Administrator of the Estate of Carmelo Carbone (a/k/a Mel Carbone ) v Arnold Blatt, et al. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 2:50 pm
  Regarding nanotoxicology, the task-force finds two texts provide the best overview of the state of current science: (i) K. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:45 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   ¨     Sierra Club v. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:00 am by Sandy Levinson
 Our only disagreement is whether one could do this via a cleverly designed legislative statute--I am in the minority that thinks this possible--or whether it would in fact be necessary to run the quite likely fatal hurdles set up by Article V to eliminate life tenure. [read post]
25 May 2022, 6:32 am by David Klein
Readers will remember that last year’s landmark Supreme Court decision in Facebook, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:23 am by Jonathan Kalmuss-Katz
The rare, two-day argument began with a challenge to EPA's December 7, 2009 finding that emissions of six GHGs, including carbon dioxide, "may reasonably be anticipated both to endanger public health and to endanger public welfare. [read post]
11 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
Scientists from "The Climate Action Tracker" stated, that despite these legal breakthroughs, "the agreement will not immediately affect the emissions outlook for 2020 and has postponed decisions on further emission reductions. [read post]