Search for: "State v. Clayton"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,127
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2009, 8:04 am
State Physicians Ins. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:41 pm
—————– Violators would forfeit their 180-day exclusivity period: Section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(j)(5)(D)(i)(V)) is amended by inserting `section 29 of the Clayton Act or’ after `that the agreement has violated’. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 6:04 am
Borough of Clayton, 696 F. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
Clayton, 1996, "The Effects of Attorney Presentation Style, Attorney Gender, and Juror Gender on Juror Decision," in Law and Human Behavior. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:57 am
In re American Express, at *8 (citing Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
" The two dissenting judges (Erdmann & Ryan, JJ.) argued that the majority's approach was precluded by United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
FTC v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:48 pm
Little Rock Cardiology Clinic v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 5:44 am
" United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:32 am
Says Walter Dellinger, who was a Supreme Court law clerk (for Hugo Black) when the Supreme Court decided the Adam Clayton Powell Jr. case (Powell v. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 4:02 pm
(It's the fun part of Marbury v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 5:39 pm
In Baker v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 11:26 am
But I do not see Powell v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 5:25 pm
That conclusion appears to rest mainly on one precedent: the Supreme Court’s decision in Powell v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 10:39 pm
" But the Supreme Court narrowly interpreted the scope of this provision in Powell v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 8:13 am
Providing a last-minute holiday present, the Sixth Circuit today finally handed down its long awaited en banc opinion in US v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 5:40 am
In finding that Cathy did have a reasonable expectation of privacy in her bedroom, the Iowa Supreme Court relied on reasoning in an opinion by a Texas court in Clayton v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 12:45 am
In Powell v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 9:18 pm
The audio for today's oral argument in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 6:05 pm
Censors should be independent, not just of the state, but of other interest groups, such as the industry itself, and yes, the child protection sector. [read post]
