Search for: "State v. Hernandez" Results 1041 - 1060 of 1,144
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Issues Around Privacy and the Right to Be Forgotten And The Freedom of Expression on Online Social Networks ,Lennin Hernandez Gonzalez, KU Leuven – Centre for IT & IP Law (CiTiP) Right to Be Forgotten: Much Ado About N [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 9:49 am
Forty-one days after Gene's lecture, CAAF would issue its opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:04 pm by CAPTAIN
  And second, remember that there is a large segment of the membership of the DCBA that has never seen the inside of a State courtroom. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 2:28 pm
  Although that case was settled by the parties and no further ruling was required, the 2nd Department panel granted a motion by the teacher's lawyers to vacate the trial court's decision, citing the Martinez case and implicitly agreeing with its holding, including the Martinez court's conclusion that the 2006 decision by the Court of Appeals in Hernandez v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Cir. 2007): Gamco alleged infringement by Multimedia’s central determinant system, as operated in the New York State Lottery. [read post]