Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 8,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2013, 9:20 am
Christopher DeFrancis and Jennifer Gross v. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Holder, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington C.A. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:56 pm
The case is Lee Oskar Levitin, et al. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:00 am
Kasai and V. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 12:30 pm
Holder and the Ironic Requirement of Social Perception to Avoid Persecution," Boston College Journal of Law and Social Justice, vol. 33, no. 3 (2013) [full-text]Tagged Publications and Events & Opportunities. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 10:01 pm
In Ortiz v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 6:52 pm
In Romeike v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
Holder," North Carolina Law Review, vol. 92, no. 1 (2014) [full-text]Immigration Judge Apocalypse 2014 (The Asylumist, Jan. 2014) [text]- Comment on the large number of immigration judges up for retirement this year." [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 12:34 pm
The case, DC Comics v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:52 am
Today's New York Times refers to a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Kansas in the case of Landmark National Bank v. [read post]
27 Jul 2024, 9:00 am
Read More » Tags: Clean Water Act, Enforcement, NPDES, United States Supreme Court [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:17 am
Bank v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 1:38 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 10:38 am
APPEAL/RESTITUTIONUnited States v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 10:00 pm
Post By Blog Staff A United States patent entitles the patent holder to exclude others from making, using, offering for sale, or selling [its] invention throughout the United States or importing the invention into the United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 1:21 pm
The complaint (full text) in Messer v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 8:59 am
In Johnston v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:52 am
At the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Emily Phelps recounts the testimony of North Carolina state senator Floyd McKissick at last week’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on a proposed constitutional amendment on campaign finance reform in light of the Chief Justice’s comments on donor influence in McCutcheon v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:48 am
Aug. 26, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit reaffirmed its prior decision in United States v. [read post]
