Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 8,237
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:25 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court held 5-4 in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 12:04 pm
” If the next election comes down to one state, he says, “we are not in a situation right now where we could stand a Bush v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 9:10 am
” Hence, Barret argued that the NGA cannot authorize certificate holders to take State-owned property. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
” See PennEast Pipeline Co., LLC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 2:27 pm
(Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, March 19, 2021, Tetragon Financial Group Limited v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 11:28 am
Flick and Elizabeth Craig Pillsbury’s communications lawyers have published FCC Enforcement Monitor monthly since 1999 to inform our clients of notable FCC enforcement actions against FCC license holders and others. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 5:34 pm
Helpful Links Behring Regional Center LLC V. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 6:50 am
Price v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:39 am
Intel still filed an amicus brief in FTC v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:26 am
Ltd v Google India Pvt. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 8:26 am
Ltd v Google India Pvt. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:01 am
” An NPR article on Guinn v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
The Genius of Shepard’s I am pretty sure that every law student in the United States still learns to use the venerable Shepard’s citation system. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 5:03 pm
A debt collector would not be liable if the letter either (i) “accurately informs the consumer that the amount of the debt stated in the letter will increase over time,” or (ii) “clearly states that the holder of the debt will accept payment in the amount set forth in full satisfaction of the debt if payment is made by a specified date. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 8:18 am
Germany is the world's most popular patent litigation venue, and last week's legislative decision does nothing to dissuade patent holders from enforcing their intellectual property rights in the largest EU member state. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:53 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Van Buren v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm
SEP injunction case law, however, has gotten out of hand with the two Sisvel v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:05 pm
Toibb v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 12:25 pm
The actual or potential use of registered marks in another form is irrelevant when comparing the signs [para. 25] (emphasis added).This is consistent with paragraph 34 of Mitrakos v EUIPO – Belasco Baquedano (YAMAS), which refers to paragraph 38 of Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE). [read post]
