Search for: "State v. Knight"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2010, 6:08 am
Of prior doctors: They are idiots; They've all been knighted. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 5:21 am
Mounsey v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 11:21 am
In one case, Little v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
. * * * Today’s topic – “Regulating Finance in a Changing Administrative State” – is no doubt a timely one, but also one that could easily serve as my job description. [read post]
31 Aug 2024, 9:05 am
United StatesMoody v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:30 pm
” As a public sector lawyer, Shawn has worked as a Washington State Assistant Attorney General (Education Division), Evergreen State College Legal Counsel, Washington State Senate Staff Counsel (Senate Committee Services) and as a Public Defender. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 4:30 am
There’ll be plenty of time to network and meet heavy hitters in the field, and there’s a reception hosted by Holland & Knight the evening of the 6th. [read post]
10 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Flinkkilä v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:04 am
That’s not the law, as the PragerU v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Rev. 285 (Winter 2010) Guyon Knight, The CAFA Mass Action Numerosity Requirement: Three problems with Counting to 100, 78 Fordham L. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Rev. 285 (Winter 2010) Guyon Knight, The CAFA Mass Action Numerosity Requirement: Three problems with Counting to 100, 78 Fordham L. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 6:11 am
Background: The Schrems II Decision and the End of Privacy Shield The executive order and accompanying DOJ regulations are intended to facilitate a new EU–U.S. data-transfer agreement, following the July 2020 decision by the CJEU in Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
” At the birth of the United States, copyright was couched in terms of property more often that not. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
”[3] He further stated, “Congress’ purpose in enacting the securities laws was to regulate investments, in whatever form they are made and by whatever name they are called. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
