Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 3,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2019, 2:00 am
The proposed panel for hand down is Lord Reed, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Briggs. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm
Its existence, however, was accepted by Lords Steyn and Hope in Berezovsky v Michaels. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:35 am
Judgment In this judgment, after setting out the background Tugendhat J considered submissions made as to his statement in his earlier judgment that “trial with a jury will generally be ordered as a matter of discretion, in particular where the state, or a public authority, is a defendant” [35] He accepted that, in the light of cases such as H v Ministry of Defence ([1991] QB 103) and Racz v Home Office ([1994] 2 AC 45) he should have omitted the word… [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:15 am
But in this connection, let us turn to the case of Hirst v United Kingdom No2 (the prisoner voting case). [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:59 am
In delivering the judgment Lord Sumption stated that the Court of Appeal authority Borneman v Wilson (1884) 28 Ch D 53 suggests that a trustee in bankruptcy must either adopt proceedings in their entirety or not at all, even where there are discrete prior proceedings conducted by the bankrupt before his appointment. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
And on 21 September 2021, a majority of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales (Lord Justice Arnold and Lady Justice Elisabeth Laing, Lord Justice Birss dissenting) upheld a decision of the High Court which agreed with the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) that Thaler’s applications should be deemed withdrawn because of his failure to identify a natural person as inventor (Thaler v Comptroller General of Patents Trade Marks And Designs [2021] EWCA Civ… [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:27 pm
The latest chapter of the “Brand Owners v Counterfeiters” saga seems again to be playing out in favour of brand owners, with last week’s decision of a Paris District Court holding eBay responsible for facilitating the sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton products. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 9:09 am
Lord Carnwath stated that there is nothing to rule out consideration of mitigation measures at the EIA screening stage, but the Directive and the Regulations expressly envisage that they will where appropriate be included in the environmental statement. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 3:25 am
Lord Neuberger was particularly keen that experimental policies not be deterred: para [97]. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 12:40 am
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
24 May 2011, 5:28 am
On 19 May 2011 Lord Stoneham asked a question in Parliament on behalf of Lord Oakeshott identifying Sir Fred Goodwin as the person who had obtained the injunction. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 6:36 pm
In Citicorp v Castex an interpretation clause in the agreement stated "Headings shall be ignored in construing this Trust Deed. [read post]
13 May 2019, 1:00 am
Paten v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 3:00 am
The Supreme Court appeal On 13 January 2015, the appeal was heard before Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
Notwithstanding the clear terms of section 33(1), after the commencement of the 2009 Act, courts either continued to apply the pre-Act line of authority commencing with the judgment of Lord Coleridge in Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 Ch 269, or at least to interpret section 33(1) through the lens of those cases. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
United States? [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:00 am
In such cases the court is not discussing the truth or reasonableness of any of the doctrines of the religious association, but as stated by Lord Davey in General Assembly of the Free Church of Scotland v Overtoun [1904] AC 515 (1904 7 F (HL) 1): “The more humble, but not useless, function of the civil Court is to determine whether the trusts imposed upon property by the founders of the trust are being duly observed. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am
However, the judgment in Lukaszewski & Ors, R (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20, handed down by the Supreme Court last week, appears to offer a ray of hope to applicants facing short time limits. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
