Search for: "State v. Maker" Results 1041 - 1060 of 4,683
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2019, 11:57 pm by Robert Margolis
Case date: 07 August 2019 Case number:No. 18-10157 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:18 pm
  Part V: The Nature of Responsibility in CSR—Remedy Week 13:  International Soft Law Approaches: the U.N. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 2:31 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Tries to address 1A issues including US v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript Law offers a graphic explainer for Kahler v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:02 am by Kristian Soltes
Rakuten, on Friday, announced that it would seek regulatory approval to obtain an industrial bank charter in the state of Utah. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am by Ben
 More on this in the IPKAT.The functionality doctrine revisited in the Lego’s Copyright dispute against its British CompetitorThe world famous toy maker from Denmark, Lego, has successfully won a copyright infringement suit against a British competitor in the US District court for the District of Connecticut. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 8:51 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This judicial review was heard recently by the Federal Court in Aryeh-Bain v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 3:30 pm by Renee Anderson
The volume’s editors (Arizona State University’s David H. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 9:06 am by David A. Martin
In Part V of the census opinion, the chief justice found a way to provide a unique check here. [read post]
20 Jul 2019, 5:59 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
In Washington state, a woman is suing a vape-maker after the battery on her e-cigarette battery reportedly exploded in her pocket in 2017 while she was driving – with her 3-year-old daughter and friend in the car. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 8:51 pm by Samantha Maddern
Provide reasons for the decision to terminate to the executive so the executive cannot rely on the absence of a stated reason to mount their case that the termination must have been because they had exercised a workplace right. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Adam Zimmerman
The Supreme Court’s latest foray into this area is Merck v. [read post]