Search for: "State v. Mark" Results 1041 - 1060 of 19,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
” Young, 291 N.C. at 568, 231 S.E.2d at 581 (quotation marks, emphasis, and citation omitted); see Godinez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:41 pm by Kalvis Golde
This morning the court issued an opinion in Kisor v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
One was a figurative mark (as represented on the right), the other being a word mark. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 8:02 am by Hayleigh Bosher
He stated that, although the EASY family of trade marks had acquired distinctiveness, the threshold for distinctiveness was set very high and the "EASY" trade mark had not acquired distinctiveness on its own. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 11:28 am by Amanda Frost
  That is the claim at the heart of Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
The Bombay High Court of India in a special hearing on Sunday dismissed a public interest litigation, which is a petition filed for public good, filed by four law students from Maharashtra and Gujarat states challenging the decision of the Maharashtra government to declare January 22 a public holiday to mark the consecration ceremony of the controversial Ram Mandir temple in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. [read post]
Case date: 12 January 2023 Case number: No. 19-13390 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:02 am by R.J. MacReady
No skid marks were found on the roadway indicating Kuciemba did not brake before the rollover. [read post]