Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 19,468
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2011, 3:41 am
Registration of the earlier trade mark in the member state concerned did not constitute a prerequisite for the running of the period of limitation in consequence of acquiescence prescribed in article 9(1).” (Case C-482/09); [2011] WLR (D) 279 WLR Daily, 22nd September 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 4:26 am
Applicant Handal's argument that Section 2(c) is unconstitutional was mooted when the Supreme Court's ruling in Vidal v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 2:59 pm
One was a figurative mark (as represented on the right), the other being a word mark. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:00 am
In Blackhorse v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:35 am
The Court of Appeals decision in ITC Ltd. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 10:02 am
No skid marks were found on the roadway indicating Kuciemba did not brake before the rollover. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:01 am
Kellogg Company, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:10 am
STATE V. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
See Iancu v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 8:32 am
ITC Ltd v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 8:02 am
He stated that, although the EASY family of trade marks had acquired distinctiveness, the threshold for distinctiveness was set very high and the "EASY" trade mark had not acquired distinctiveness on its own. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 4:59 pm
The Supreme Court granted cert. in the SAF case, McDonald v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:44 am
You may perhaps recall Marks from your old law school days. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Franek v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:52 am
The Bombay High Court of India in a special hearing on Sunday dismissed a public interest litigation, which is a petition filed for public good, filed by four law students from Maharashtra and Gujarat states challenging the decision of the Maharashtra government to declare January 22 a public holiday to mark the consecration ceremony of the controversial Ram Mandir temple in Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:40 am
Olin Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 11:28 am
That is the claim at the heart of Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Today marks the 90th anniversary of the landmark Olmstead v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:01 am
The registration states “women’s high fashion designer ? [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 5:06 am
DC Comics v. [read post]
