Search for: "State v. S. R. R." Results 1041 - 1060 of 71,790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2013, 9:47 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) As a follow-up to yesterday’s post on the briefing in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:01 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Clinton, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2 (17 January 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Royal Bank of Scotland v Revenue And Customs [2012] EWHC 9 (Ch) (17 January 2012) Armstrong DLW GmbH v Winnington Networks Ltd [2012] EWHC 10 (Ch) (11 January 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Thomas Brown Estates Ltd v Hunters Partners Ltd [2012] EWHC 30 (QB) (17 January 2012) Legal Services Commission… [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 1:57 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Varsani, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 1938 (05 August 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Dee v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2010] EWHC 1939 (QB) (28 July 2010) Drake v Starkey [2010] EWHC 2004 (QB) (05 August 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) TR v Asylum and Immigration Tribunal [2010] EWHC 2055 (Admin) (05 August 2010) Jisha v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010]… [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 9:15 am by ASAD KHAN
Overall, a states duties to a refugee reaching a particular territory – whose international relations the state controls – are in principle and in normal circumstances limited to providing and securing the refugee’s Convention rights in that context. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 11:29 am
Behn, Judging the Misapplication of a States Own Environmental Regulations Guillermina Ester, Returning to the Issue of Nationality Daniel Allen, PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd v Independent State of Papua New Guinea [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:48 pm by Giles Peaker
TW, SW, and EM, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough Of Hillingdon (2018) EWHC 1791 This was a judicial review of Hillingdon’s allocation scheme and in particular, the thresholds for eligibility for inclusion on the housing list set by Hillingdon. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:46 am by EMMA FOUBISTER, MATRIX
In July 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hughes) heard this appeal relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]