Search for: "State v. So" Results 1041 - 1060 of 117,807
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2024, 3:04 am by Giles Peaker
The FTT had held that the clause was not intended for “works so extensive that the costs would vastly exceed those likely in any category expressly mentioned. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 2:00 am by Rachel Neave
Proponents of this viewpoint also pointed to the landmark case of Brown v. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 10:30 pm by Sophie Dukarm
The answer – according to settled case law – is that the term ‘Member States’ refers to ‘government authorities of the Member States’ (see, for example, Région wallonne v Commission (para. 6.)). [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 8:23 am by Rich Vetstein
I’m not so sure of that, given the state legislative policy of setting a hard deadline of either 30 or 50 years that they can remain in place. [read post]
13 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court did not invalidate a state anti-miscegenation law until 1967 in the famous case of Loving v. [read post]