Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 3,916
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Board of Education the protagonist and paradigm. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
Board of Trustees, 489 U.S. 468, 479 (1989). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:04 am
The case is Lax v. 29 Woodmere Boulevard Owners, __ F. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:51 am
Board of Education, which explore the acceptablity of "separate but equal" facilities for citizens at two different points in the history of the U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 10:43 am
Board of Education, which explore the acceptablity of “separate but equal” facilities for citizens at two different points in the history of the U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 8:00 am
As a result, the court held that the plaintiff failed to plead with particularity that a majority of the board was not disinterested or that they received a personal benefit not shared equally by the stockholders. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am
Decision under appeal: added subject-matter, clarity and support by the description2.1 In Reasons 2.1 of the appealed decision, the examining division raised an objection under Article 123(2) EPC against feature (c) of claim 1 (cf. point V above). [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:42 am
Wong and United States v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 7:00 am
Board of Education in 1954, education litigation has slowly progressed under State constitutions towards recognizing an affirmative duty for States to provide a free and equal education. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 7:20 am
AFSCME’s legislative and political arm, denoted Public Employees Organized to Promote Legislative Equality, PEOPLE, aspires to lobby school boards, city councils, county boards, the state legislature, and Congress, to achieve passage or defeat of legislation affecting public employment (very broadly defined). [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 11:52 am
In Texas v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 7:32 am
Central Park: Ward v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
Oct. 1, 2007), the court held that Twombly “is equally applicable” to fraudulent joinder. [read post]
27 May 2013, 7:05 am
Buzzfeed’s Chris Geidner discusses the prospect that, if the Court does not strike down California’s Proposition 8 on Equal Protection Clause grounds in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:23 pm
In New Mexico State Investment Council v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 10:39 am
Parents for Privacy v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Those hours multiplied by his standard hourly rate equals between $322,500 and $400,000, so he testified that a reasonable and necessary fee would be between $300,000 and $400,000. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 10:05 am
The recent Ontario Superior Court case of Hogan v. [read post]
