Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 21,969
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2015, 8:15 pm
The attorney for the plaintiff states, after the plaintiff's arrest and sometime during the plaintiff's wrongful confinement, the Old Brookville Police Department charged the plaintiff with the violation offense of harassment in the second degree, even though the Old Brookville Police Department knew the plaintiff had not committed the alleged violation in their presence as required by CPL § 140.10 (1) (a). [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 7:18 am
The court granted plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:09 am
The list of the top 16 firms may be found here, in a table that may be expanded to show the name of each plaintiff and each opposition number.I recommend that you check out Towergate's 2(d) Citation Watch service (details here). [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:58 pm
Plaintiffs also alleged misleading nondisclosure. [read post]
3 Jul 2006, 9:10 am
Leafe has ruled that Dryvit's Outsulation is defective and awarded Plaintiffs $2.5 Million in Board of Directors of the Bay Point Condominium Association Inc., et al v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:25 am
The jury agreed with plaintiff and awarded more than $50 million in damages. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:49 pm
Toward that end, we have scheduled testing. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 1:05 am
The complaint seeks to recover damages on behalf of the plaintiff class. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 10:35 am
Mills, (D ME, filed, 8/25/2021), alleges free exercise and religious discrimination violations, saying in part:The dispute in this case is not about what accommodations are available to Plaintiffs or whether accommodation of Plaintiffs’ sincerely held religious objections can be conditioned on compliance with certain reasonable requirements....The dispute is about whether Defendants are required to even consider a request for reasonable accommodation of… [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
Applying the 3-prong test for the opening of a default judgment, the court noted that the Defendant would have to show that (1) the Petition to Open the Judgement was promptly filed, (2) that the Defendant had a meritorious defense, and (3) that there was a reasonable excuse for the Defendant’s failure to answer the Plaintiff’s Complaint in a timely fashion.The court reiterated that the Plaintiff had made proper service. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
The court said in part:The state’s test-or-vaccination requirement was a neutral law of general applicability that only incidentally affected employees with religious objections and did not “target[] religious conduct for distinctive treatment. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 4:15 am
Historically, plaintiffs had to show explicit injury, such as a broken leg, before the other party can be ordered to pay for diagnostic tests. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 4:09 pm
The 3rd Circuit conceded that predatory pricing principles, including the price-cost test, would control in cases solely presenting a challenge to pricing practices. [read post]
24 May 2014, 3:30 pm
A plaintiff's proof of injury must be supported by objective medical evidence, such as sworn MRI and CT scan tests. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:23 pm
Dep’t of Justice, the Federal Circuit, relying on the Drake decision, held that a WPA plaintiff need not demonstrate that he blew the whistle on an actual violation of law: We reiterate, however, that “[t]he test is not whether [the petitioner] was able to prove [a violation], but rather could a disinterested observer with knowledge of the essential facts known to and readily ascertainable by [the petitioner] reasonably conclude . . . that a violation did occur. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 4:00 pm
In applying the Pansy test, the Special Master concluded that permitting disclosure of defendants’ attorneys’ eyes only information to plaintiff’s corporate representatives would not “promote fairness and efficiency” in this case and was “outweighed” by the injury to the defendants that might result from such disclosure. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:03 pm
The test of retroactivity is found in Landgraf v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 7:06 am
“ABC test” applies. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:02 am
Moreover, when Hyundai’s experts performed crash testing, they relied on and used the figures given by Webb in his deposition in an attempt to test his opinions and refute his testimony. [read post]
30 Dec 2023, 8:22 pm
The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
