Search for: "Tony Mauro" Results 1041 - 1060 of 2,205
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2008, 4:16 pm
A Renewed Focus on Consular Notification and Heliberto ChiWith the clock ticking toward's a 6:00 p.m. death warrant and legal papers filed at the Supreme Court, there is a new focus on the Chi case.At The BLT, Tony Mauro posts, "Supreme Court Weighs Another Texas Execution. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 1:39 pm
I just noticed this Legal Times piece by Tony Mauro discussing Justice Samuel Alito notable (and in my view praiseworthy) decision to get out of the cert pool (first discussed here). [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 4:06 pm
Thanks to How Appealing I saw that Tony Mauro has this new column in Legal Times headlined, "Scalia to Join Supreme Court Book Club; Don't expect a tell-all: Justice is working on guide for lawyers. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 8:56 am
Legal Times' Tony Mauro has this report on the Supreme Court ruling.On Monday the Supreme Court ruled in Carey v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 3:16 am by Edith Roberts
” In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro observes that, for the third year in a row, Cato Institute senior fellow Ilya Shapiro “has filed what he calls one of Cato’s ‘funny briefs’ with the U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am by Amy Howe
  Richard Re covered the oral argument in Williams for this blog, with other coverage from Tony Mauro for The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required) and Danielle Blevins of Talk Media News; Nina Totenberg previewed the case for NPR. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 9:40 am
That's the title of a National Law Journal report by Tony Mauro. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:18 am by David Oscar Markus
From Tony Mauro at Law.com:Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who was not on the Court for the Melendez-Diaz case, sent out mixed signals on whether she would provide the vote needed for reversal. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:36 am by Jay Willis
Florida, which Tony Mauro of the National Law Journal characterizes as a “rare victory” for death penalty defendants and their advocates. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:44 am by Adam Chandler
  At the Blog of LegalTimes, Tony Mauro reports on a discussion of cameras in the courtroom last week at the Tenth Circuit Bench and Bar Conference. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am by Dan Stein
 At the New York Law Journal, Tony Mauro suggests that Justice Anthony Kennedy’s role as the author of the Court’s opinion in Windsor secured his “place in history” as “the court’s strongest champion of gay rights. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 6:12 am by Amy Howe
  In the Legal Times (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports that the pope “made an unscheduled visit Wednesday night to the Little Sisters of the Poor with the aim of showing support for the group’s battle against the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate before the U.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:26 am by Amy Howe
” In the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports that the “recent release of the annual financial disclosure forms submitted by U.S. [read post]
17 May 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” At The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro passes on former solicitor general Paul Clement’s “tips on how to get the Supreme Court to overturn a precedent. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro asks several “Supreme Court practitioners for their current thinking on why so few women argue before the Supreme Court, and what can or should be done about it. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” At Law.com, Tony Mauro reports that Justice Elena Kagan said Wednesday that “[l]ife tenure for U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro reports that the “late U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:50 am by Amy Howe
In The National Law Journal (subscription or registration required), Tony Mauro reports that “Supreme Court justices, aided by their staff, do their own manual checking for potential conflicts of interest, unlike lower federal judges who use more systematic methods that include computer software. [read post]