Search for: "Trademark Cases"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 23,931
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2015, 4:30 am
Miavana & Family, Inc., Case No. 6:15-CV-919 (M.D. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:50 pm
Whereas last year’s update featured a host of new cases, this year Jane has not only added the latest reported decisions on contributory and vicarious liability for trademark infringement, she has expanded [...] [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
As a result, the court vacated the summary judgment ruling, and remanded the case for further factual determinations on the issue of likelihood of confusion.The case is instructive for several reasons:· It serves as a reminder that trademark owners should file trademark applications as early as possible. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:30 am
The case is instructive for several reasons: · It serves as a reminder that trademark owners should file trademark applications as early as possible. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 9:57 am
Here is a quick recap of the facts of the case. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 10:30 am
The answer, as is so often the case in law, is “it depends. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 10:30 am
The answer, as is so often the case in law, is “it depends. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 6:32 pm
The People’s Court should determine case brief for Civil Disputes Over Registered Trademarks, Company Names and Conflicts of Certain Prior Rights, in accordance with the Civil Case Brief Provisions (provisional), and apply suitable provisions, considering the claims of the plaintiff and the nature of the civil dispute. [read post]
28 Oct 2006, 7:27 pm
Instapundit links to a case of viral marketing gone bad. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 2:29 pm
In case of registered trademarks, the confusion is implied if someone uses another’s trademark in association with goods or services for which the trademark is registered. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:42 am
An interesting trademark case was recently decided by the Federal Circuit. [read post]
7 May 2019, 1:37 pm
The case Iancu v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 3:18 pm
”[2] This case […] The post Former NFL player’s trademark ruled not famous in lawsuit concerning “The Biggest Loser” show appeared first on Santucci Priore, PL. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 3:18 pm
”[2] This case […] The post Former NFL player’s trademark ruled not famous in lawsuit concerning “The Biggest Loser” show appeared first on Santucci Priore, PL. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:12 am
The case is Planet Coffee Roasters, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:34 am
The case is titled Entrepreneur Meia, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 12:13 am
Kevlin and Jessica Litman, Trademark and Unfair Competition Law; Cases and Materials (4th ed. 2007). [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:37 am
If an EU trademark is registered after March 29, 2019 (which would be the case if an application to register is filed as of now or later), and there is no Brexit deal between the UK and EU, then mark owners will actively have to establish their EU-cloned trademark rights in the UK on their own within a nine-month period established by the EU and UK by filing a new UK application at their own expense during that period. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 7:13 am
Compare the Slep-Tone cases in the 7th and 9th Circuits: you can’t get around Dastar by incorporating a trademark into your copyrighted work, because that would create a perpetual copyright over the unmutilated work. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 9:21 am
One can assume that this will be an aggressively fought case by both parties. [read post]
