Search for: "Turner v. AT"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,910
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2019, 5:22 am
While the statute does not limit recovery only to the offending attorney’s client (see Fields v Turner, 1Misc2d 679, 680-681 [Sup Ct, NY County 1955]), “[t]he ‘party’ referred to is clearly a party to an action pending in a court in reference to which the deceit is practiced, and not a person outside, not connected with the same at the time or with the court” (Gelmin v Quicke, 224 AD2d 481, 483 [2d Dept 1996], quoting Looff… [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 8:49 am
Turner v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:02 am
Co., 303 AD2d 323, 324; Turner Constr. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 5:55 am
Similarly, in Turner v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
George v [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:55 am
North Carolina (No. 13-633) Turner v. [read post]
19 Jan 2020, 10:40 am
Hence the grant of the licence in August 2018 This evidence was accepted by the UT on the Ladd v Marshall principles. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 6:02 am
The dispute in Erwin v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 4:00 am
Lack of tree canopy, lack of air conditioning at home or work and inefficient infrastructure can also play a part, said V. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 12:27 pm
See Turner v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 8:46 am
S. 74 (1980) and Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 8:22 am
Turner Broad. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 9:52 am
-T.; Wayne Turner v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:57 pm
United States and Turner v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:57 pm
United States and Turner v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm
In his opinion, he cited the 1994 case Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:57 pm
United States and Turner v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:19 am
Accordingly, the retainer agreement utterly refutes the plaintiffs’ contention with respect to the scope of the CMM defendants’ representation in that regard (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850), and the Supreme Court properly directed dismissal of the fourth and fifth causes of action. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 6:35 pm
(TURNER) • S140272 • A109257 • 1/1 Transferred after hold LYTWYN v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:11 am
In Epstein v Cantor, decided last December by Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Larry D. [read post]
