Search for: "US v. Rose" Results 1041 - 1060 of 2,378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 2:23 pm
Trade Marks and Domain NamesKat Eleonora Rosati discusses a recent US trade mark case Beyoncé Giselle Knowles-Carter, et al., v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Norton Rose Fulbright Data Protection Report had a post “EU’s possible Data Act: What can we anticipate from the Inception Impact Assessment and the Consultation? [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
 Kat Eleonora reminded us of the New joint IPKat/BLACA event! [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech &… [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Constitution Daily reports on Hernandez v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:47 am by dbllawyers
The American Arbitration Association (AAA) reported that total arbitration case filings rose by 26% from 2014 to 2015. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 11:40 pm by Karen Ainslie
 The question around the use of autonomous self-driving cars is no longer hypothetical. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 6:45 am by John H Curley
Merck maintained that it had not outsourced work, but that it had simply hired and laid off employees as demand for Janumet rose and then fell. [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:01 pm by Ronald Mann
Acuff-Rose Music, holding that 2 Live Crew’s parody of Roy Orbison’s “Oh, Pretty Woman” was a fair use. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 3:29 am
 IPKat's summary of the Supreme Court decision (Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2018] UKSC 56) can be found here. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 5:08 am by Verushka Reddy
  On the contrary she admitted that she used cannabis for medicinal and recreational purposes, outside of work, and contended that it was her right to do so, relying on the judgment of the Constitutional Court in Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others v Prince (Clarke and Others Intervening); National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others v Rubin; National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others v Acton. [read post]