Search for: "United States v. Detente"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 3,297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2010, 4:01 pm
Allen v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 1:56 am
United States, respondent-appellees
U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:03 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Monday in Trump v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:56 am
Several basic themes emerge from a survey of the history and law of quarantine in the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 9:34 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 6:44 pm
The Law Library of Congress in Washington, D.C. has published a report a little while ago about Miranda Warning Equivalents in more than 100 countries around the world.In the United States, so-called Miranda rights are named after the US Supreme Court decision of Miranda v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:16 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:30 pm
He was finally brought home to the United States and never charged with a crime. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 8:10 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 7:28 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 8:42 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:02 pm
In a class-action challenge to immigrant detention, Jennings v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:38 am
Judge Sentelle noted, as Judge Bates had, that the Boumediene decision laid down three tests to apply when deciding how far habeas rights reached beyond the United States’ own territory: the process for deciding who is to be detained, the nature of the site where detention occurs, and practical problems of having courts decide the validity of detention. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:09 am
Despite U.S. court’s dismissal of these cases, that the United States tortured and abused many men in pursuit of its so-called “war on terror” is not in dispute. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 2:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 4:42 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am
This followed from the recent Supreme Court decision in R (Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 WLR 671, in which it was decided in the immigration context that a failure to review an immigration detainee’s detention in accordance with policy rendered that detention unlawful. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 4:31 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 3:10 pm
” The petition poses this question: “Whether, in a habeas corpus action brought by an individual held in United States territory, including Guantanamo, (a) Munaf v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 1:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
