Search for: "United States v. London"
Results 1041 - 1060
of 1,914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
Department of Justice has stated that the criminal division has started a far-reaching probe, and that they are “responding aggressively and taking it very seriously. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 4:42 pm
Daly, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, announced the sentence. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
The rise of PIPCU Launched on 12 September 2013 with £2.6m of taxpayer funding over two years from the Intellectual Property Office and a special focus on offences committed online, the activities of the Police Intellectual Property Crime Unit, operated by the City of London Police, have perhaps so far attracted most attention in the pages of Torrentfreak. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:25 am
Wainer filed for divorce in the Principal Registry of the Family Division, London, England (the "London Action"). [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:14 pm
In December 2012, there were 326 million mobile subscriber connections in the United States. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
And much Internet traffic between two foreign countries often passes through the United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
(Designers Guild Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 5:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:51 pm
United States, Kingsley Books v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 8:52 pm
Ruspoli knew or believed that the Statue was owned by .the Kingdom of Cambodia or knowingly provided false or misleading provenance information about the Statue;Legal observers of the case, docketed as United States Of America v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 1:59 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
Consider it a replay of that old Hume v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
(G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2004] 2 AC 208 (HL(E)) establishes that it is not possible to carve out a section 17 duty to house families where children are already accommodated. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
(G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2004] 2 AC 208 (HL(E)) establishes that it is not possible to carve out a section 17 duty to house families where children are already accommodated. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:03 am
These elements have been largely endorsed by higher courts, such as by the UK Supreme Court in RB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and OO v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 10. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:04 pm
Simon.Stahl, Philip Michael.Chicago, Illinois : ABA Section of Family Law, [2013]KF547 .S733 2013 Family Law According to our hearts : Rhinelander v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 4:42 am
United States, the bizarre Supreme Court case in which a Pennsylvania woman was convicted of using a toxic chemical in an attempt to poison her husband’s lover. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
Is this, asks Merpel, the first time an appeal in any IP proceedings in the United Kingdom has been dealt with by a predominantly female tribunal? [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:00 pm
They demolished the great principles that your forefathers, the founding fathers, built the United States of America on. [read post]
