Search for: "United States v. Means" Results 1041 - 1060 of 29,954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Jenny Gesley
Unlike regulations, which are generally binding and directly applicable in every EU member state, directives are only binding with regard to the result that must be achieved; the means are up to the member state. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Maggie Mills
The United States appears poised to heed that call with the small fraction of Russian frozen assets subject to U.S. jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
There are a handful of other cases that reinforce the thrust of Ex Parte United States: People v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In Abitron, the opinion of the Court insisted that “Congress has premised liability on a specific action (a particular sort of use in commerce),” and further stated that both 32 and 43(a) “treat confusion as a means to limit liability to only certain ‘bona fide use[s] of a mark in the ordinary course of trade. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Since then, subsequent additions to the official History of the Supreme Court of the United States have been famously unpunctual, uneven, and mostly unheralded. [read post]
AUSTRAC also co-hosted a Pacific Financial Intelligence Community meeting and provided the Cook Islands Financial Intelligence Unit with a new TAIPAN data analytics system. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:32 am by Nathan Dorn
Mathew Carey is well-known for printing the Catholic bible (the Douay Bible) for the first time in the United States. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Rose
In a new memo published Tuesday in the Federal Register, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) also says “no. [read post]
” That means any consumer who wants to sue Amazon must do so under the laws of Washington State, and more importantly in this case, the WCPA. [read post]